Last updated: August 4, 2026
Anyone can publish a “best tools” list. This page explains how DG Grow decides what to publish, so you can judge whether to trust it.
Who writes here
DG Grow is written by Nazmus Sakib, who builds and runs the things covered on this site — WordPress sites, automation workflows, AI tooling and affiliate projects. Articles are written from first-hand use wherever possible. Where they are not, the article says so.
How a tool gets recommended
- Hands-on use first. Preference goes to tools actually installed, paid for and used on a real project — not tools known only from a landing page.
- Real limits get named. Every tool has a weak spot. If an article does not mention one, it is not finished.
- Fit over popularity. The best tool for a solo creator in Bangladesh is often not the one a US agency would pick. Recommendations say who a tool suits and who should skip it.
- Pricing is checked at publication. Prices move constantly; the figure quoted was correct on the date shown, and the vendor’s own page is always authoritative.
Independence from advertisers
Advertising and affiliate commissions fund this site, and that relationship is disclosed in full in our Affiliate Disclosure. What money does not do:
- No advertiser, affiliate partner or sponsor gets to review an article before publication.
- Commission rates play no part in ranking a comparison post.
- Criticism is never removed at a partner’s request.
- Paid placements are labelled as sponsored at the top of the article, without exception.
Sourcing
Claims that are not based on our own testing are attributed and linked to the original source — official documentation, vendor announcements, or primary research. We avoid citing sites that simply rewrote someone else’s reporting.
How AI is used
AI tools are a core subject of this site, and they are used in producing it: for research, outlining, editing and translation. They are not used to publish unreviewed text. Every article is read, verified and edited by a human before it goes live, and factual claims are checked against a source rather than trusted to a model.
Updates and corrections
Software articles decay fast, so posts are revisited periodically and the update date is shown on the article. When a correction is substantive — a wrong price, a broken claim, a changed recommendation — we fix it and note the change rather than editing silently.
Found an error? Email sakib9294@gmail.com. Corrections are welcome and get priority over everything else in the inbox.
What we do not publish
- Guaranteed-income claims or get-rich-quick framing.
- Reviews of products we have not used or properly researched.
- Spun, scraped or unattributed content.
- Link placements dressed up as editorial. See Write For Us for what we do accept.